Overview (by Aerbax)

An overview can be found on Hello Monero

Logs

<fluffypony> time for meeting to start <hyc> ok <ArticMine> Ok <fluffypony> ArticMine / othe / smooth / NoodleDoodle / moneromooo / tewinget / dEBRUYNE / gingeropolous / etc. <dEBRUYNE> somewhat here <fluffypony> ok <fluffypony> welcome to the 75th annual hunger games <fluffypony> ok so <fluffypony> first things first, small administrative update <fluffypony> we've re-applied for funding from the OTF, but for Kovri (given their previous response) <fluffypony> it's the start of the process, but who knows, maybe we have a bit of funding to work on both <fluffypony> as Monero represents an example integration <fluffypony> then the open issues are creeping up, there are a bunch I'm going to be closing as solved <fluffypony> #754 is an interesting onw <fluffypony> *one <fluffypony> https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/issues/754 <moneromooo> We don't care now, since rct. <fluffypony> good point <fluffypony> ok so then it can be closed as wontfix <moneromooo> Well, it's fixed, by transfer_new. <fluffypony> yes <fluffypony> so <fluffypony> I'd like to reopen the discussion of deprecating transfer and replacing it with transfer_new <fluffypony> or is that pointless because rct <moneromooo> I've done that in the rct branch. <fluffypony> ok great <fluffypony> perfect <fluffypony> then binary renames are on hold until the rct PR <fluffypony> because I don't want to make that implode <hyc> what renames? <moneromooo> I don't think this would conflict much, if at all. <gingeropolous> bitmonerod --> monero and stuff like that prolly <fluffypony> hyc: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/issues/80 <fluffypony> this in particular: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/issues/80#issuecomment-223596750 <hyc> ah <fluffypony> moneromooo: do you want me to PR changes to your branch then? will save you a rebase? <moneromooo> Sure. <fluffypony> ok great <moneromooo> Would rct be merged before the wallet2_api stuff then ? <fluffypony> so that's the next thing for discussion <fluffypony> the massive wallet2 PR <fluffypony> it's rebased against master now <fluffypony> moneromooo: what are your thoughts on merging before or after ? <moneromooo> I don't really have one. <moneromooo> Maybe merge Ilya's first, since there's not going to be much review/fixes anyway. <fluffypony> ok <gingeropolous> so wallet2 a buncha stuff specifically designed for GUI? <moneromooo> wallet2_api is. <fluffypony> there's also been a fair amount of review on that PR because it's so hefty - is everyone comfortable that major issues (especially in git history) have been resolved and it can be merged? <moneromooo> Depends on how high you put the bar. <fluffypony> moneromooo: it's low - we can open issues to fix stuff after the merge <moneromooo> But assuming the GPL code is gone, I think it's ok. It can be changed later. <fluffypony> oh the GPL cmake stuff, I'll check on that <fluffypony> looks like there's a BSD licensed replacement now <moneromooo> I saw the comment, I did not look at the new code. <fluffypony> hokay <fluffypony> then there are a bunch of new PRs if anyone wants to take a glance at them <fluffypony> #878, #879, #882, #883, #884, #885 <fluffypony> they're mostly small <fluffypony> I need someone to check mine (885, just a readme change) before merging plx <hyc> huh i only see up to 881 <hyc> oh PRs not issues <moneromooo> I seem to have reviewed all these, except the windows packages one which I have no clue about. <fluffypony> it compiled successfully <fluffypony> couple of weird complaints about deprecations at the end <fluffypony> C:/msys64/mingw64/include/boost/type_traits/detail/template_arity_spec.hpp:13:84: note: #pragma message: NOTE: Use of this header (template_arity_spec.hpp) is deprecated <fluffypony> # pragma message("NOTE: Use of this header (template_arity_spec.hpp) is deprecated") <fluffypony>
<hyc> I've been getting that on most builds now <hyc> boost 1.60 <fluffypony> ah <fluffypony> boost, sigh. <hyc> not sure what there is to do about that since it's an internal header file, not one thata we explicitly include <fluffypony> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/264164 <fluffypony> fixed in 1.61 <hyc> ok <fluffypony> ok so <fluffypony> general update-y time <fluffypony> tewinget doesn't seem to be around, he can update us on 0MQ when he is <fluffypony> moneromooo: how goes ringct? <moneromooo> I'm kinda blocked today, so I didn't do much. <fluffypony> I mean in the last two weeks since the last meeting, lol <moneromooo> Both that watch only thing that nobody wants to talk about, and waiting for shen's sybil resistant upgrade. <fluffypony> kk <moneromooo> Well, last two weeks, more tests, fixes, sweep_all now uses rct, and better output selection (for the general case). <hyc> does rct let us do watch only with both deposits and withdrawals? <moneromooo> No. <fluffypony> this sorta bounces back to the MRL, so we wait for feedback <fluffypony> hyc: are you doing anything interesting at the moment? <hyc> not really. I still need to come up with a fix for txn_full on 32bit <hyc> I'm traveling most of the the rest of this month <hyc> so not much hacking time <fluffypony> cool beans <fluffypony> ok - anything else from anyone else? <luigi1112> Hi <luigi1112> :-) <moneromooo> If anyone wants to start reviewing the rct-rptest branch, I don't think it's going to change again (save new commits). <moneromooo> Like, find how to pwn it. <fluffypony> oh luigi1112 I forgot to tag you at the beginning, apologies <moneromooo> Would be a good job for Heuristic, except there's no picture of hte code... <moneromooo> Oh, some other dev related thing: luigi1112, any news on the change to signing something from a standard address ? :) <luigi1112> Nah I've been reading but don't have any time to participate atm <luigi1112> Oops :-) <luigi1112> Still soon <fluffypony> you forgot the tm <fluffypony> it's not soon if it's not tm <luigi1112> Well it should be this week or next :-) <fluffypony> ok I think that brings the meeting to a close - Kovri meeting is only in 23 minutes, so feel free to add / discuss new things and it'll be in the log <hyc> i got nothing, catch y'all next time <gingah> any new thoughts on the auto fee thing? <rg> id like to bring up the most imporant issue, fluffypony -- free XMR for me <fluffypony> gingah: auto fee? <moneromooo> The thing ArticMine was looking at - scaling fees based on... stuff. <ArticMine> Setting fees based on the blocksize <ArticMine> and the reward penalty <ArticMine> One also has to look at optimizing what transactions miners will accept vs block penalty and fees paid

7.5 KiB Raw Blame History

Overview (by Aerbax)

Logs

7.5 KiB

Raw Blame History