mirror of
https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site.git
synced 2024-12-24 12:39:46 +00:00
d185db671f
+ corrections after testing
236 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
236 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
layout: post
|
||
title: Logs for the Monero Research Lab Meeting Held on 2018-05-07
|
||
summary: Sarang work, Surae work, and miscellaneous
|
||
tags: [community, crypto, research]
|
||
author: el00ruobuob / surae
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Logs
|
||
|
||
**\<sarang>** OK, it's time to begin
|
||
**\<sarang>** Welcome to everyone; hello
|
||
**\<sgp\_[m]>** Hi!
|
||
**\<sarang>** Calling others: hyc suraeNoether anonimal endogenic binaryFate fluffypony luigi1111 luigi1113 rehrar[m] monerigo[m] gingeropolous dEBRUYNE
|
||
**\<sarang>** and many others no doubt
|
||
**\<sarang>** s/monerigo[m]/moneromooo
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** présent
|
||
**\<sarang>** I suppose we can discuss recent updates and such
|
||
**\<sarang>** I have been focusing on noninteractive refund transactions
|
||
**\<sarang>** it's surprisingly tricky to get right
|
||
**\<sarang>** The idea of whether or not to hide block heights has big implications on size and complexity
|
||
**\<sarang>** and also will affect the use of old outputs
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** Hey everyone, sorry I'm late (and not using my registered nick)
|
||
**\<sarang>** A good higher-level question is whether we insist that having refund transactions is enough of a priority
|
||
**\<sarang>** Hello fake suraeNoether
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** heh
|
||
**\<sarang>** \*enough of a priority to devote big plumbing-level changes
|
||
**\<sarang>** these questions have consumed me as the Whale consumed Ahab
|
||
**\<sarang>** and, like Ahab, I spend much time in the company of Starbuck(s)
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** gross
|
||
**\<sarang>** theRealSurae: what has consumed you lately?
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** it feels like there should be an easier way to hide amounts. Maybe worth mulling for some time
|
||
**\<sarang>** UkoeHB: other than commitments?
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Hi
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** Yeah. Maybe a shift in perspective. Baseless intuition
|
||
**\<silur>** what
|
||
**\<sarang>** Well, the current Best Way is homomorphic commitments + range proofs to ensure balance
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** I've been thinking about koe's reduced mlsag and how we might be able to batch-verify ring signatures with bulletproofs. and i've been speaking with a professor at clemson university about the possibility of starting a paid project for a grad student to invent a new elliptic curve with 2^255-19 points on it, or to come up with a similar sort of variant to secp256k1
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** yeah, I think we are going to experience reduced returns in terms of hammering bulletproofs for improving our amount strucutres
|
||
**\<sarang>** theRealSurae: BPs to batch verify our current MLSAG scheme?
|
||
**\<silur>** oh yea the curve order question you asked
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** so, i think it'd be really really helpful for both bitcoin and monero to have alternate curves
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** ohgod
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** other than that and the multisig dump I made the night before yesterday, this week has been consumed by editing papers for other folks. Koe and my old advisor and another document. lots of reading this week
|
||
**\<sarang>** What are your thoughts on refunds?
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** and thank you for that :) incredibly helpful
|
||
**\<sarang>** UkoeHB: any big changes to your excellent paper?
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** Well we found out monero doesn't even use borromean sigs
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** genBorromean should be genSAGs
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** Or something
|
||
**\<sarang>** SAG?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** I've been thinking a lot about the refund structure with timelocks, and I'm trying to figure out exactly whether we have a novel "invention" in these refund transactions or whether tit is equivalent to a timelock+multisig situation
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** spontaneous anonymous group sig. Like LSAG but no key images
|
||
**\<sarang>** for range?
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** Yeah
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** Check ringCT.cpp genBorromean
|
||
**\<sarang>** Yeah I'm familiar with that code
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** It's 33% larger range proofs than a real borromean setup
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** ... i need more details about that, koe, if you don't mind...
|
||
**\<sarang>** heh
|
||
**\<sarang>** theRealSurae: big thing is non-interactivity
|
||
**\<sarang>** I don't need the recipient's cooperation
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** I'll see what I can do
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** thanks koe, i'm not in a rush on that though...
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** I want to remind everyone that I'll be mostly away from the internet from tomorrow until the 19th, with some intermittent access.
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** luigi1111: is this (genBorromean doesn't actually generate Borromean sigs) correct ?
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** yup have fun :). Vacation right?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i'm not the sort who can really put work down, but i'm trying, briefly. i managed to write up a skeleton of the unforgeability proof for multisig and hand it off to sarang to familiarize himself with the musig approach
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** Zcash is also coming up with their own curve so as to speed up the particular things they need to. I find it worrying if the trend is that every project cooks up their curve to suit their particular needs.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** and, like I said, I'm communicating with some folks at Clemson
|
||
**\<sarang>** Yeah I've been revisiting the original musig paper
|
||
**\<luigi1111>** Not that I know of
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: why would this be worrying?
|
||
**\<luigi1111>** theRealSurae: 2^255-19 isn't the number of points
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** you are right, it's the group order
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** against the "don't invent your own crypto", and light years away from typical review process for curves
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** right? i misspoke
|
||
**\<vtnerd>** no, 2^255-19 is the prime field
|
||
**\<sarang>** I hear it's a kind of cake
|
||
**\<sarang>** Or that feeling when your leg falls asleep and you stand up
|
||
**\<luigi1111>** Group order is l
|
||
**\<luigi1111>** 2^252+blah
|
||
**\<sarang>** aaaanyway
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i confess I tend to think of our group as a scrambled mirror image of Z\_q, despite addition of points not even landing on the subgroup.
|
||
**\<sarang>** So theRealSurae is working on unforgeability
|
||
**\<sarang>** I am figuring out if noninteractive new-output-style refunds are worth it
|
||
**\<sarang>** Other fun times?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: yeah, I see that
|
||
**\<sarang>** binaryFate: do you have any information on the Zcash efforts? I wasn't aware of their work
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: eventually that curve, even if proven to satisfy our desired properties, will have to be implemented, and the dangers or crappy implementation are huge... but I don't think that should discourage research into new curves and new proof methods using isomorphic curves
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** yeah, I wasn't either. I thought it was just Blockstream looking for a variant of secp256k1 so far
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** oh i messed up - they are borromean ugh
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** that's a relief koe!
|
||
**\<sarang>** UkoeHB: what led to believe otherwise?
|
||
**\<luigi1111>** ^
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** misreading code like a fool
|
||
**\<UkoeHB>** thought this hash\_to\_scalar(L[1]) meant an array of hashes for each L[1], instead of a hash of the entire array
|
||
**\<sarang>** Good thing hashes aren't important to borromean sigs /s
|
||
**\<sarang>** If there aren't any other big topics to discuss, we could certainly return to refunds or previous topics
|
||
**\<sarang>** There were suggestions from luigi1111 that the refunds needed for payment channels would be possible purely w/ timelocks + multisig
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** will look for some link on the zcash curve thing. It's part of their roadmap to reduce overhead to generate z-transactions iirc
|
||
**\<sarang>** I do not see how that would be possible without interaction from both parties, or a third-party arbiter
|
||
**\<sgp\_[m]>** I just want to mention that I'm working on preserving the integrity of outputs held by mining pools
|
||
**\<sarang>** But I'd love to be convinced otherwise
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** MRL corporate cheer!
|
||
**\<sarang>** sgp\_[m]: in response to the linking work?
|
||
**\<luigi1111>** It does require interaction at the start
|
||
**\<sarang>** right
|
||
**\<sarang>** it'd have to
|
||
**\<sarang>** So the recipient pre-signs for the refund?
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** I have a bit of other ZCash news.
|
||
**\<sgp\_[m]>** sarang kinda, yeah. I don't have too much to mention now though
|
||
**\<sarang>** How does the network verify the spend of the originally-intended output?
|
||
**\<sarang>** sgp\_[m]: ok, keep us updated
|
||
**\<sneurlax>** I've contacted ehanoc re: the "transaction tree" python toolkit and we will collaborate to deliver that after I finish the scraping tool which moneromooo asked for. mooo, I'll be sending you results this week
|
||
**\<sneurlax>** sorry to interject
|
||
**\<sarang>** sneurlax: excellent! That'll provide good data
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** rehrar[m]: tell us?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** sneurlax: that's fantastic news
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** ZCash wants to open a grant proposal jointly with a Monero community member (that'd be me atm) to donate a considerable sum of money to some FFS proposals.
|
||
**\<sarang>** What types of FFS do they want to fund?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** how would that work? would you have discretion over donating the funds?
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** https://twitter.com/socrates1024/status/993252058923925506?s=19
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i'll almost always take free money if it's no-strings
|
||
**\<sarang>** Aw shucks, they like us!
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** that's... fantastic
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Dunno. When next round of bp auditing funds?
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** We can out it up, raise the amount, and take out right away. Superior Coin also wants to help if you recall.
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Perhaps we can also get subaddresses audited?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** hmm
|
||
**\<sarang>** Yeah, was thinking of waiting until closer to the finalization, but I suppose there's little advantage if we can coordinate w/ OSTIF quickly
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** it seems like a lot of projects want to funnel their research funding through the Monero FFS
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** the harder we criticize them the more they like us... 10k$ is not that much compared to amounts raised typically anyway
|
||
**\<sarang>** It's a nice gesture of community spirit though
|
||
**\<sgp\_[m]>** I think the best ones are the hardware wallet (which should work with Zcash iirc) and code audits
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** They're masochists binaryfate. If we criticize harder they'll give more.
|
||
**\<sarang>** A subaddress audit depends highly on the scope
|
||
**\<sarang>** The BP scope was narrow-ish
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: yeah, it seems like a largely symbolic thing, but also: they've been really encouraging me and sarang to encourage you guys to ask for grant money.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** rehrar[m]: i should just take zooko out to a bdsm club in denver, see if they offer us six or seven figures. :P
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** In return , we can send them Monero stickers to put on their laptops.
|
||
**\<sarang>** something something meat market
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** meat meat something market
|
||
**\<binaryFate> \<rehrar[m]>** In return , we can send them Monero stickers to put on their laptops. <-- they have one at least, we've put one on zooko's back at CCC without him noticing
|
||
**\<sarang>** I'll be interested to see how the 10K is disbursed
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** sarang: Is the implication that it would totally be up to our discretion? that's sort of what i'm getting...
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Zooko is a dude.
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** I chilled with him in Colorado.
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Can neither confirm nor deny Verge dev there too.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** What if we take the 10k, pay for a semester of a grad student working with some cryptographers to invent three new curves, a variant for secp256k1, a variant for x25519, and a variant for zcash's thing
|
||
**\<sarang>** tall order
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** maybe
|
||
**\<endogenic>** sorry rehar
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** it'd guarantee that student would spend the rest of his time in grad school working on that sort of thing
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** which I think would be a valuable thing: seed the mind-virus among as many researchers as possible
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** They're not even asking for doing joint work with zcash stuff at this stage apparently. Would just channel to Monero topics entirely if possible.
|
||
**\<pwrcycle>** Hi all.
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** Anyway grad student is a great idea
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: yeah, that's the inference I made
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** I'll talk with Miller.
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** See how he wants to do the grant proposal.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: the problem then is picking the student/school
|
||
**\<pwrcycle>** Funding grant money for school research seems cool. Pinning all the hopes on one grad student seems like a bad idea.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** rehrar[m]: please do, maybe CC me... I can hook him up with at least two cryptographers at Clemson who may be interested
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** pwrcycle: yeah, you'd pick by advisor more than student
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Maybe we can get some people to make a FFS that should have made one a while back in exchange for ZCash paper
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Like dEBRYUNE
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Then again, what use have gods for our petty currencies.
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** Btw having some sort of pulic call for the paid internship circulating in academic circles is as important as the thing actually happening, in terms of mind-virus spreading
|
||
**\<rehrar[m]>** Nothing more from me.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** rehrar[m]: you are the greatest orator of our time
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** binaryFate: TRUE point
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** very true
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** sarang
|
||
**\<sarang>** yo
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** when I get back I'm going to look into putting job postings on mathjobs.org
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i was about to ask you to do it while i'm gone, but it's not urgent and there's no need to delegate. :P if you're curious, though :D
|
||
**\<sarang>** I think using mathjobs is a really good idea for pure math applicants
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** there are lots and lots of applied jobs on there too
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** you should check it some time, but
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** creation of a curve is at the intersection of applied algebraic geometry and pure cryptography
|
||
**\<sarang>** right, that wasn't what I meant
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** so it's sort of both pure and applied
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** oh ok
|
||
**\<sarang>** I mean to get solid reach to academics
|
||
**\<sarang>** that's the obvious choice
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** yep
|
||
**\<sarang>** They can send us a list of all the points on their new curve, for us to check
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** good old emails circulating between labs and advisors ("if you have a really good students, consider asking them to apply. And please forward blabla") is also worth it. Reaches more senior people than a job posting probably read primarily by students directly.
|
||
**\<sarang>** Oh, so I've been seeing random reddit postings about deep reorgs
|
||
**\<sarang>** But I haven't looked into it at all
|
||
**\<sarang>** Anyone know anything?
|
||
**\<selsta>** also articles are starting to come out https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/05/07/monero-allegedly-attack-claims-double-spends-orphaned-chains-21-block-deep
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** I think it's fixed now (no PR yet).
|
||
**\<sarang>** Do you know the cause?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** is it known what the issue was?
|
||
**\<sarang>** jinx
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** The +20-blocks fork mentioned in the post is not an actual fork, you only see that when syncing. But somebody is fiddling with decent HR
|
||
**\<sarang>** buy me a DietMonero
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i thought the first few reports were possibly the OP for some reason
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** moneromooo link or summary?
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** Some init wasn't done in some cases when adding a tx.
|
||
**\<sarang>** Yeah, I want to be able to give correct information
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** So that was causing the tx to be rejected though it is valid.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** hrmm
|
||
**\<sarang>** OK, so that explains the "double spend" FUD
|
||
**\<sarang>** The long-chain reorgs are just related to initial sync?
|
||
**\<sarang>** It was noted that there wasn't any big spike in hashrate
|
||
**\<sarang>** so it's not outsiders coming online and futzing
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** If a pool doesn't accept a valid tx, it will continue mining on its own chain till it stops doing so.
|
||
**\<sarang>** OK, so it's a single cause with these two effects?
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** What two effects ?
|
||
**\<sarang>** Well the reports I've seen have complained about apparent double spends (rejected tx) and long-chain reorgs
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i feel like if a selfish miner was going to release a chain in an attack, the hashrate wouldn't necessarily look different to an observer, especially if the attacker had 33%+ attack power and was clever with their timestamp choice...
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** I don't know anything about double spends.
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** Though if a merchant is only connected to that pool, you could swindle it.
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** The merchant would have to be only connected to that pool though, but that's not a new attack.
|
||
**\<sarang>** Yeah that's just being cavalier
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/05/07/monero-allegedly-attack-claims-double-spends-orphaned-chains-21-block-deep
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** i don't like that article for a variety of reasons, but
|
||
**\<sarang>** Yeah that's the article I keep getting linked to
|
||
**\<sarang>** it's based on some r/monero complaint posts
|
||
**\<sarang>** so naturally it will be accepted as gospel and spread widely
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** it would be helpful to get more information from the specific users making this complaint
|
||
**\<sarang>** A random user says one thing and the devs who know things say another thing! So there's no way to know!
|
||
**\<binaryFate> \<sarang>** It was noted that there wasn't any big spike in hashrate <-- if someone is purposefully mining on alternative blocks rather than winning chain, we would not "see" the HR spike as it does not make blocks coming faster
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** You'd see a hashrate spike downwards.
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** only if that miner was mining before no?
|
||
**\<moneromooo>** Yes.
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** not necessarily; an attacker with exactly 50% hash rate and honest timestamps will appear to be invisible. an attacker with lower hash rate could mess with timestamps slightly and appear invisible. an attacker with too low of a hash rate couldn't manipulate his timestamps enough to hide his activity
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** (not necessarily re: downward spike)
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** Can we check how long it took them to mine a particular altchain of N blocks by checking logs on other nodes on when the last block in their chain got known to peers?
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** we can put a bound on it, for sure, and we can use that to estimate the hash rate power they have
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** ok y'all I gotta go
|
||
**\<theRealSurae>** have a good week and a half!
|
||
**\<binaryFate>** same!
|