Misc comments

This commit is contained in:
Luke Parker 2024-09-20 02:12:26 -04:00
parent 554c5778e4
commit 2984d2f8cf
4 changed files with 4 additions and 15 deletions

View file

@ -53,20 +53,6 @@ TODO
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
async fn get_block_number(&self, id: &<Self::Block as Block<Self>>::Id) -> usize {
self
.provider
.get_block(B256::from(*id).into(), BlockTransactionsKind::Hashes)
.await
.unwrap()
.unwrap()
.header
.number
.try_into()
.unwrap()
}
#[cfg(test)]
async fn get_transaction_by_eventuality(
&self,

View file

@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ pragma solidity ^0.8.26;
The alternative would be to have a council publish the Serai key on-Ethereum,
with Serai verifying the published result. This would introduce a DoS risk in
the council not publishing the correct key/not publishing any key.
This design does not work with designs expecting initialization (which may require re-deploying
the same code until the initialization successfully goes through, without being sniped).
*/
contract Deployer {

View file

@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ async fn signable_transaction(
// It is a reused value (with later code), but that's not an issue. Just an oddity
&mut ChaCha20Rng::from_seed(id),
&rpc.rpc,
// TODO: Have Decoys take RctType
match rct_type {
RctType::ClsagBulletproof => 11,
RctType::ClsagBulletproofPlus => 16,

View file

@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ impl<S: ScannerFeed> SchedulerUpdate<S> {
pub type KeyScopedEventualities<S> = HashMap<Vec<u8>, Vec<EventualityFor<S>>>;
/// The object responsible for accumulating outputs and planning new transactions.
// TODO: Move this to Scheduler primitives
pub trait Scheduler<S: ScannerFeed>: 'static + Send {
/// An error encountered when handling updates/payments.
///