From 205a0ba101089c27cf9567084aed7e727be480f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: moneromooo-monero <moneromooo-monero@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:42:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] unit_tests: make the density test a bit less stringent
It's an inherently random test
---
tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp b/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp
index 0094fc765..235b1c809 100644
--- a/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp
+++ b/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ TEST(select_outputs, density)
float chain_ratio = count_chain / (float)n_outs;
MDEBUG(count_selected << "/" << NPICKS << " outputs selected in blocks of density " << d << ", " << 100.0f * selected_ratio << "%");
MDEBUG(count_chain << "/" << offsets.size() << " outputs in blocks of density " << d << ", " << 100.0f * chain_ratio << "%");
- ASSERT_LT(fabsf(selected_ratio - chain_ratio), 0.02f);
+ ASSERT_LT(fabsf(selected_ratio - chain_ratio), 0.025f);
}
}