--- layout: post title: Logs for the Kovri Dev Meeting Held on 2017-08-06 summary: Brief review of what has been completed since last meeting, discussion of meta issues, and code & open tickets discussion tags: [dev diaries, i2p, crypto] author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony --- *August 6th, 2017* # Logs **\** Alright, meeting time. **\** 1. Greetings **\** 2. Brief review of what's been completed since the previous meeting **\** 3. Contributor FFS check-in / status **\** 4. Code + ticket discussion / Q & A **\** 5. Any additional meeting items **\** 6. Confirm next meeting date/time **\** Greetings **\** Hello **\** Hi **\** Hello serhack **\** hi **\** hi ArticMine, hi Anonimal **\ {-pigeons}** howdy **\** Hi ArticMine, hi pigeons **\** 1.a: how's everyone doing? **\** Well weren't there some things to go over regarding that ffs pr? **\** Oh. We'll talk bout it later. **\** In the meeting. **\** Taking care of wife. We both doing ok. **\** Good I hope. **\** And hi. **\** How're you anonimal? **\** I wish her a speedy recovery. **\** 2. Brief review of what's been completed since the previous meeting **\** How's your transition going? **\** lol, funny how you use the word "transition" (inside defcon joke, ping endogenic) **\** I'm doing fine, thank you. **\** Not much to report this past while cuz of the surgery. I'll be making up the time this week. **\** re: 2., I spent most of the past two weeks AFK; busy with fedcon25 and the #monerola meetup (prep/travel/etc.) **\** So busy with kovri promotion/discussion. As for repo work, I've been able to do documentation and site-related work. **\** We missed thee. **\** I'm also way past my milestone hours so I'll need to submit a milestone report to the FFS. **\** Anonimal: I have a lot of question about Kovri, I will connect to irc **\** What else has been completed since the previous meeting? **\** Yay, willkommen. **\** rehrar have you been able to work on any kovri things? **\** lol wait… transition? **\** See my above comment. **\** rehrar: oops, I just read your line (didn't see it) **\** endogenic: Oh, I think it was more a pwrcycle inside joke. Nm. It was re: "Janet". **\** But no, I'm not in transition, lol **\** 3. Contributor FFS check-in / status **\** ohhh **\** I meant from anonymous to not. **\** that makes sense **\** lolo **\** Ah, I first thought the same, then talk of surgery, so I wasn't sure. **\** yeah anonimal **\** can imagine how concerned everyone was **\** Nah. Surgery is my wife. She had some surgery on her eyes this week. **\** dang **\** everything ok? **\** Ye. Her eyes strained at the computer where she works, so we got her Lasik. **\** ohh **\** re: 3., like I mentioned, I'll submit a milestone report. I use Kimai to keep detailed logs, down to the second, of all my billable activity. I'd like to submit those instead of writing TL;DR's but on the other hand I don't want all my time publicly tracked. I'll keep TL;DR's for the forum but have timesheets available for core team review if requested. **\** :O **\** MoroccanMalinois is AFK I don't have an update on his FFS status. **\** He did say he's submit something soon though. **\* anonimal** shrugs **\** rehrar: any kovri FFS plans? **\** FWIW, I was keeping track at 5 minute increments, then keeping it to myself. Never been a problem. It only would be with slackers I expect. **\** Ummm FFS plans? **\** k **\** Yes, to have one if needed. **\** alright, I'm here on IRC sorry for the delay. **\** 4. Code + ticket discussion / Q & A **\** re: point 4, and also going back to point 2, I did do a lengthy review of MoroccanMalinois' open PR #684. **\** But other than that, I don't have any comments on point 4. Any questions? **\** I did notice that the issue-helper on the meta repo appears to be in full swing and is looking good, pigeons. **\** 5. Any additional meeting items **\** Anyone interested in discussing quantum entanglement as a solution to nullifying the Alice/Bob relationship in order to eliminate the possibility of Eve? **\** Any reference on this? **\** Not that I know of. It was something I started talking about while at fedcon25. **\** But I need much more information. **\** wat **\** Wouldn't that need custom hardware that's nowhere near everyday buyers ? **\* anonimal** is not a quantum specialist **\** so would that mean Eve is both Alice and Bob at the same time **\** Probably, and probably a custom science too. **\** What I mean is, AFAICT it's the only way to eliminate Eve and until then, anonymity will always have the potential to be broken. **\** ajsantos: I don't know **\* anonimal** will need to brush up on entanglement **\** But if two points are guaranteed to only exist as a single unified point, I would imagine that Eve could not be Alice or Bob. **\* anonimal** shrugs, #monero-future-futures **\** Ok Alice + Trump Bob = Jong-un Eve = ? **\** Alice = Trump **\** Oh, one more thing, we'll have the 96boards.org podcast on August 17th. **\** Details in meta/#46 **\** Anything else or shall we wrap the meeting up early? **\** nothing for me, sorry. I've got a lot going down atm, so I'm in and out intermittently **\** Yes, Alice would = Bob so their state would be agreed upon at any given moment so long as they become entangled. **\** Whether passive observation at that point is even possible, I don't know. **\** The only use of qe I know about is for Alice to send a message to Bob (ostensibly a key), in a way that Eve cannot eavesdrop on it without Bob being able to detect it. **\** (only use for crypto) **\** I remember seeing a talk about that a while ago. re: anonmymity, I don't know if the concept of "hops" would apply though, and I don't know if "building a network of entangled points" would be an accurate solution to creating an anonymity set. **\** So many questions! **\** AFAICT, the use of this would be to strengthen the crypto, which is already likely well armoured. **\** It wouldn't do anything for traffic analysis. **\** But then maybe there's more stuff qe can be used for... **\** You'd need to pre-share a LOT of bits if you did not want only the key to be sent, though. **\** And QE is EASY to collapse. **\** Actually, I don't know anything about this, ignore me. **\** It is a possible research topic at this point as far as I can see **\** I'm not a huge fan of PQ discussion because of the number of everyday issues we're currently tackling but for some reason I am intrigued about this area. **\** Yes, I would like to do more research and write something if needed. **\** i.e., if it's not already been written. **\** My FFS could cover it under "Research improving I2P and overlay-network security" and "Opening new proposals". **\** Though I had imagined something more near-future tangible. We'll see. **\** Eek, out of time. 6. Confirm next meeting date/time **\** Same time, two weeks (August 20th)? **\** Ok, thanks everyone :)