--- layout: post title: Logs for the Community Meeting Held on 2018-03-03 summary: Community highlights, Forum Funding System updates, RFC-HWALLET-1, Localization workgroup, Bulletproof audit discussion, MoneroV discussion, and miscellaneous tags: [community, crypto] author: el00ruobuob / SamsungGalaxyPlayer --- # Logs **\** 0. Introduction **\** We would like to welcome everyone to this Monero Community Meeting! **\** Link to agenda on GitHub: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/186 **\** Monero Community meetings are a discussion place for anything going on in the Monero Community. We use meetings to encourage the community to share ideas and provide support. **\** 1. Greetings **\** Hello! **\** Hi **\** Hello **\** 2. Community highlights **\** XMR.RU has translated many important articles into Russian: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/81owe8/xmrrureport_february/ **\** [REDDIT] XMR.RU-report (February) (self.Monero) | 8 points (91.0%) | 4 comments | Posted by TheFuzzStone | Created at 2018-03-03 - 09:06:46 **\** The Ledger team posted their latest update a little over a week ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/7zez0g/ledger_hardware_wallet_monero_integration_some/ **\** [REDDIT] Ledger Hardware Wallet - Monero integration : some news #7 (self.Monero) | 368 points (96.0%) | 56 comments | Posted by cslashm | Created at 2018-02-22 - 13:45:50 **\** There is an important Core Team announcement. binaryFate will replace tacotime as a Core Team member: https://getmonero.org/2018/03/01/core-team-announcement.html **\** Here is a discussion regarding the bulletproof audit request: https://forum.getmonero.org/7/open-tasks/89993/bulletproofs-audit **\** The date of the hardfork is still not set. There will developer meetings every Sunday until the hardfork, including tomorrow. **\** Does anyone else have any updates I missed? **\** (other than FFS ones of course) **\** you didn't think I'd miss this meeting **\** sgp_ : https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/7zet99/serhack_updates/ **\** [REDDIT] SerHack updates (self.Monero) | 85 points (99.0%) | 38 comments | Posted by serhack | Created at 2018-02-22 - 13:19:02 **\** How's Mastering Monero coming along serhack? **\** The cover : https://i.imgur.com/woJmssA.jpg I think I must mark the help from the community members **\** Anyway I'm going very good at writing, some users (cryptochangements, 4matter, sarang .. ) helped me with solid feedbacks **\** At the moment, there is a little draft: https://masteringmonero.com/book/monero.pdf :) It's not finished of course **\** That's great to hear! Are you still pushing the latest updates to Taiga? **\** I am going to abandon the Taiga Wiki because I think it's better to have a github repo , anyway some contents will remain to Taiga :) **\** I am doing all best in order to have both Taiga and Github **\** Just skimmed it (EXTREMELY quickly of course) and it's looking awesome! A lot has changed since the last time I checked **\** The book looks very good, well organized and comprehensive. **\** It looks like a great tool people can use to learn more about Monero. Great job! **\** yes, I think it's about 60% . I would like to mark I don't want to take all credits. **\** This community is awesome because we have awesome users! **\** Thank you guys! **\** :) **\** Anyone else have any news? **\** thanks for this serhack **\** Yeah, I do. **\** Go ahead rehrar **\** For those who don't know, I've been working on a thingy to teach the community about open source, with the goal being that the open source vision really sets the stage for the Monero vision **\** and it's hard to 'get' one without understanding the other **\** The past week or so I've directed anyone who would listen to this pad: https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/thegoodxmrpad **\** where they can share their favorite open source projects **\** A good list has been compiled so far, although it's only scratched the surface. **\** I'm ready to do a launch on the initiative, and will be making a post today. **\** Great! I look forward to it **\** I'll probably be holding a livestreamed mini-conference before the weekend is over for anyone who wants to come **\** just talk about open source and chill **\** We mentioned earlier when you first introduced this initiative that it's important for people to understand the merits of open-source **\ \** I'd be sure to watch it ;) **\** All right, post it in r/MoneroCommunity and I'll hop on **\** that's it for me **\** All right, time to move to FFS updates! If anyone has other items, we can get to them later **\** 3. FFS updates **\** There are several Forum Funding System updates. **\** a. RFC-HWALLET-1 project progress **\** @msvb-loc **\** The latest prototype 'Prime Platine' design is a few hours from being finished. **\** A board rendition is complete: **\** taiga.getmonero.org/project/michael-rfc-hwallet-1-implementation/ **\** It will go to press in a couple days and I hope to have PCBs in a week, then assemble them. **\** Last week I visited the Embedded World (largest embedded hardware conference in the world) and spoke to manufacturers and IC chip vendors all day. **\** The most important thing (since we otherwise have all bases covered) is to get a stable and high quality display (OLED) supplier, so that's what I was working on. **\** Are there any questions about the state of Monero hardware? I have no more comments. **\** How hard do you think it will be to get an OLED supplier? **\** You guys decided on a secure element? **\** sgp_: Not too hard to get a supplier, it might mean we need to buy quantities or plan way ahead (since they can only deliver with 6 weeks lead time.) **\** rehrar: We're still intent on trying for Microchip CEC1702 secure MCU, and if that fails a Nordic nRF52840. **\** We will have Atmel secure elements on top of those things regardless. **\** Last night I met with WolfSSL and a local hardware engineer. They are partnering with Infineon on their secure elements, but it's not a good deal. Very closed, secretive, and they don't like small (OSH) groups like ours. **\** They are doing TPM. **\** rehrar: What do you think, any suggestions or opinions about this? **\** I don't have the expertise to have an opinion, but I remember it's been a point of great discussion on previous hardware meetings. **\** So I thought I'd ask. **\** I'm really shorting the story of course. I met with Samsung as well, because they now have low powered IoT modules with TPN and crypto inside, quite cheap. But that would divert our resources too much, because it's a radically different architecture. **\** There's nothing to say that the first Kastelo schematic released needs to be the last ;) **\** Ha, yes the schematic is here: **\** https://taiga.getmonero.org/media/attachments/1/c/7/0/857dcae1517fe27c1988443ef7da48e2570af956d34ba7957f6b542c2a95/breakneck-sch.png **\** sgp_: Thanks. **\** Thanks msvb-loc. Always interesting to see what's going on on the hardware side of things. **\** b. Localization workgroup Q&A **\** @erciccione_[m] **\** I've noticed that you have been very busy lately :) **\** that's me :) **\** yes a lot of new contributors, and that's extremely good **\** also, people started using Taiga for coordination within communities of translators and i'm very happy about that **\** i've no particular updates, except for the fact that my FFS proposal will expire on the 7th **\** i'm already writing another one hoping in the support of the community. it will be out tomorrow :) **\** Sweet, you already answered my question **\** anybody has questions? **\** When Italian site? :D **\** looking forward to a complete language **\** in the new FFS there will also be a resume of what have been achived durign this 3 months **\** Thanks erciccione. I look forward to reading it **\** rehrar: i hope soon, the PR is there and it's ready to be merged, but i've been doing a lot of support this week i couldn't dedicate much time to it **\** cool **\** Does anyone else have a FFS update? **\** I do **\** i hope i can push some more pages next week **\** I've got an active FFS with Kovri that's ongoing. **\** Unfortunately, on a personal level, February was a difficult and stressful time for me, and I completed about 15 out of 40 hours **\** so obviously I will not accept any payment, and will instead accept for March since things have quieted down for me **\** just an update for the community **\** Thanks for the update **\** so yeah, Jan, Feb and March will simply become Jan, March, April **\** cool, makes sense **\** 4. Bulletproof audit discussion **\** Let’s spend a little time discussing the bulletproof code audit proposal. As mentioned earlier, the proposal is here: https://forum.getmonero.org/7/open-tasks/89993/bulletproofs-audit **\** MRL’s overview and suggestions are here: https://github.com/b-g-goodell/research-lab/blob/master/audits/BP/README.pdf **\** yea :) rehrar **\** Does anyone have any feedback that sarang and surae can use as they prepare the FFS request to be moved to Funding Required? **\** does suraeNoether or sarang have anything to say regarding this? :D **\** They're probably doing more important things **\** They just had another research paper dropped on their desk **\** What does SoW stand for, Securing of Work? xwerter6 left the room (quit: Ping timeout: 260 seconds). **\** msvb-loc, where do you see SoW? **\** Scope of Work, I believe **\** sgp_: SoW is the prefix to many of the bids on: **\** https://github.com/b-g-goodell/research-lab/tree/master/audits/BP/ **\** ah, I see now. see rehrar's answer **\** Anyway, I'm happy that the review of bulletproofs should be happening soon **\** If there are no further comments, I'll move on **\** Hmm, SoW means Scope of Work and not Stake of Work? Hmm. **\** I guess the computer industry is a bit of a victim of acronym overuse sometimes. :) **\** 5. MoneroV discussion **\** The community needs to stay vigilant for the upcoming MoneroV fork, which poses a threat on Monero. I have seen an increasing number of news articles that reference this fork without referencing any of the possible harms. I have also seen more people think that simply using a temporary wallet removes all the risk. **\** Let’s spend some time recommending ways the community can address chain splits. How can we handle the social, community aspect of it? **\** ie: how can we effectively get the message across, even to those with no idea how Monero works? **\** Is MoneroV specifically intended to cause harm to Monero? (Sort of like how Roger Ver created the BCash fork of Bitcoin and seems to be trying to destroy Bitcoin?) **\** We will need to provide the users with options and the long term effects **\** @Randolf it is most likely just someone trying to get rich quick, but who knows? **\** sgp_: As seems to be the case with many forks. **\ \** Your video on it I think helped a lot... but most people are too lazy to watch a 20 minute video smh **\** Is this the first time that Monero has been forked? **\** I do not think MoneroV was deliberately designed to hurt Monero **\** That's good, at least. **\** It is the first time we have an "air drop" **\** If sgp agreed with me , I could try to reach some users by writing a solid article in my blog. **\ \** No, it's just the first time people are trying to participate in a scammy airdrop **\** serhack sure, the more exposure the better **\** guys i have to go. Will catch you tomorrow **\** bye erciccione_[m] **\** So, referring to it as "yet another fork" could be helpful. **\** That way it keeps Monero in the "driver's seat" so-to-speak. **\ \** Perhaps we could put something about it in the daily discussion thread on reddit? Yesterday I spent way too much time explaining to people that it's a scam and bad for their own privacy **\** I recommend writing a comprehensive guide on /r/xmrtrader that is stickied. But I would still like some feedback regarding what to include to best get the message across to those who think this is just another opportunity to make money **\** Yes but will that be enough? I mean XMR at 100,000 USD and scammy XMV at 0.5% market cap or 50 USD x10? **\** That would put MoneroV at a larger market cap than Monero today **\** This is the kind of long term risk that I have to be concerned about **\ \** I wanna know who is actually going to be buying these coins tho... literally everyone I have spoken to about it just wants to dump them **\** I think over 95% of people see this as an opportunity to dump **\** sgp_: Dump what? **\** So I am in the camp of safely splitting of the XMV by using the same mixing on both chains **\** The XMV **\** In regards to ArticMine's comments, I have some news **\** Moneromooo and stoffu have been hard at work on a tool that could be used to mitigate the impact of hardforks. You can see my comment on the issue, where it provides three key features: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/3322 **\** As an end-user, if it's a hard-fork then I naturally see that as a benefit to me because it means that my holdings increase. The question becomes, do I keep my hard forked holdings, or do I sell them (e.g., for Monero or something else)? **\** Before you get overly excited that someone has created a tool, keep in mind this tool only works if many people use it. If only about 20% of people claiming their MoneroV use this sort of tool, then about 42% of those who use the tool will still have their transactions revealed immediately after the fork. This is still better than 100% of transactions. Furthermore, using a tool when some number of transactions exist after the fork will have significant benefits. **\** Yes I am very much aware of their work. It provides some very critical tools **\** To do what I am suggesting **\** My perspective, as an end-user, is that Monero is the de facto base or fallback that I can always depend on. **\** s/My/From my/ **\** Randolf meant to say: From my perspective, as an end-user, is that Monero is the de facto base or fallback that I can always depend on. **\** The problem is that, with ringsize 5, we need to get over 2/3 of MoneroV claimers to use a tool like this, at least initially **\** Ringsize will likely be a topic ant the dev meeting **\** at **\** For those using the tool to feel reasonably comfortable **\** Yeah, I'm taking about MoneroV though **\** But yes increasing ringsize is part of the mitigation **\** We can have forks in the future that advertise themsevles as "MoneroLight" with mandatory 0-mixin transactions **\** rendering tools like these useless **\** So yes, the best thing Monero can do (tool or not) is to increase its own ringsize. I advocated at the last meeting for 7 **\** Actually such a 0 mixin fork does not pose a threat to the exixting chain **\** Since ti does not compromise prior outputs **\** it **\** ArticMine yes, because it reuses the same key image on both **\** thus the input is still compromised **\** A 0 mixin fork would even be worse **\** Because there aren't any mitigations you can use such as using the same ring **\** it's as if you sent a 0-mixin transaction in Monero directly **\** but only affects those who use the fork **\** True **\** Uh no **\** wait **\** Not if your output is used as decoy **\** Well, the inputs still impact the Moenro blockchain **\** yes debruyne **\** I can walk you through it later ArticMine if you want **\** For the sake of this meeting though, I just want to make people aware that this tool now exists, and that we can consider options to convince people to use something like this **\** Yes I see because they are exposed as real **\** or spent to be correct. So they cannot be used in the future **\** as decoys **\** It would reduce the ring size with 1 **\** If they are used as decoy, because they are provably spent **\** If anyone would like to help me create posts telling uninformed people about MoneroV and what to do, I would really love your help. Send me a PM and we can get a workgroup together. Since this is a social problem, I'd rather not try and handle it myself **\** We don't really have much time left for open ideas time, but is there anythign else people want to add quickly? **\** Yes that is the issue. But for post fork txs one has to use only post fork mixins as a defense to such a 0 mixin air drop **\** ArticMine yes, that is one of the protections included in the tool **\** Which means the negative impact wears off very quickly fortunately **\** Anyone have an idea of a stopgap service to run a website on kastelo.org or getkastelo.org? **\** Good question msvb-loc that I wish I had the answer to **\** Is there something like Hotmail for websites, that allows an idiot to create a single page site in 5 minutes? **\** what's stopgap? **\** rehrar: Until we can get a real website in 1-2 months. **\** msvb-loc, you don't need an idiot to create a web page in 5 minutes **\** I'm a web developer **\** .............remember? **\** rehrar: Yes, and you are already doing twenty things. **\** I know that. **\** well make it 21 **\** github bootstrap template? **\** rehrar: Then the problem is solved, thank you very very very much. **\** I'll see if I can't get you a single page as a temp within the week **\** make a Taiga thing with all the info you want to be on it **\** rehrar: Okay, I'll do that. **\** Any other last-minute thoughts? Now's your last chance **\** 7. Confirm next meeting date/time **\** Happy Valentine's Day! **\** The next community meeting will be two weeks from today on 17 March. The Coffee Chat will be next Saturday on 10 March. **\** 8. Conclusion **\ \** No open ideas? **\** That’s all! Thanks for attending this Monero Community meeting, and we hope to see you on /r/MoneroCommunity and #monero-community. Take care, and know that change starts with YOU. **\** meeting 'officially' over **\** but 'unofficial' open ideas time starts now **\** @cryptochangements we ran out of time, but I'm happy to still discuss them here **\ \** Ok cool **\ \** Someone mentioned on reddit the other day doing an AMA on r/IAmA to answer questions that people who might not really know that much about cryptocurrency might have. It could also be a chance to promote why we need financial privacy. Good idea? Bad idea? **\** Good idea imo **\** But we need to convince those at AMA why **\** I don't feel like Reddit is the right platform tbh **\** phx[m] I still think it would be more helpful than harmful **\** The interesting part will be who they would accept. They typically need to have some formal position afaik **\** I don't see an AMA producing high quality questions. **\** I think it will be met with a lot of uninformed skepticism and misinformation. **\** I can already see the highest upvoted comment being an essay moaning about energy consumption. **\** Followed by an attempt to explain the merits of PoW, which the average /r/IAMA vistor will not understand anyway. **\** I still think it's good to answer these questions