From 2285c3c61572d0ce21b42d76f7c0c37967a485d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: HardenedSteel <19209715+HardenedSteel@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:57:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] faq: update the inflation bug question

make the answer translatable
add moneroinflation.com

closes #2339
---
 _i18n/en.yml             | 2 ++
 get-started/faq/index.md | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/_i18n/en.yml b/_i18n/en.yml
index 710fea59..a053e64a 100644
--- a/_i18n/en.yml
+++ b/_i18n/en.yml
@@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ faq:
   a12-1: In Monero, every @transaction output is uniquely associated with a key image that can only be generated by the holder of that output. Key images that are used more than once are rejected by the miners as double-spends and cannot be added to a valid @block. When a new transaction is received, miners verify that the key image does not already exist for a previous transaction to ensure it's not a double-spend.
   a12-2: We can also know that transaction amounts are valid even though the value of the inputs that you are spending and the value of the outputs you are sending are encrypted (these are hidden to everyone except the recipient). Because the amounts are encrypted using @Pedersen-commitments what this means is that no observers can tell the amounts of the inputs and outputs, but they can do math on the Pedersen commitments to determine that no Monero was created out of thin air.
   a12-3: As long as the encrypted output amounts you create is equal to the sum of the inputs that are being spent (which include an output for the recipient and a change output back to yourself and the unencrypted transaction fee), then you have a legitimate transaction and know no Monero is being created out of thin air. Pedersen commitments mean that the sums can be verified as being equal, but the Monero value of each of the sums and the Monero value of the inputs and outputs individually are undeterminable.
+  aabout-auditability: More about supply auditability
+  adetailed-auditability: Deeper analysis of supply auditability
   q13: Is Monero magic and protects my privacy no matter what I do?
   a13: Monero is not magic. If you use Monero but give your name and address to another party, the other party will not magically forget your name and address. If you give out your secret keys, others will know what you've done. If you get compromised, others will be able to keylog you. If you use a weak password, others will be able to brute force your keys file. If you backup your seed in the cloud, you'll be poorer soon.
   q14: Is Monero 100% anonymous?
diff --git a/get-started/faq/index.md b/get-started/faq/index.md
index 1c3f9ed7..e99f0fab 100644
--- a/get-started/faq/index.md
+++ b/get-started/faq/index.md
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ meta_descr: faq.intro
                         <p>{% t faq.a12-1 %}</p>
                         <p>{% t faq.a12-2 %}</p>
                         <p>{% t faq.a12-3 %}</p>
-                        <p>{% t faq.additional %} <a href="{{ site.baseurl_root }}/2020/01/17/auditability.html">About supply auditability</a></p>
+                        <p>{% t faq.additional %} <a href="{{ site.baseurl_root }}/2020/01/17/auditability.html">{% t faq.aabout-auditability %}</a></p>
+                        <p>{% t faq.additional %} <a href="https://moneroinflation.com">{% t faq.adetailed-auditability %}</a></p>
                     </div>
                 </div>
                 <div class="tab" id="max-supply">