diff --git a/contrib/depends/packages/openssl.mk b/contrib/depends/packages/openssl.mk index 06b2ebb..1f69240 100644 --- a/contrib/depends/packages/openssl.mk +++ b/contrib/depends/packages/openssl.mk @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ $(package)_version=3.0.8 $(package)_download_path=https://www.openssl.org/source $(package)_file_name=$(package)-$($(package)_version).tar.gz $(package)_sha256_hash=6c13d2bf38fdf31eac3ce2a347073673f5d63263398f1f69d0df4a41253e4b3e +$(package)_patches = CVE-2023-0464.patch CVE-2023-0465.patch CVE-2023-0466.patch CVE-2023-1255.patch define $(package)_set_vars $(package)_config_env=AR="$($(package)_ar)" ARFLAGS=$($(package)_arflags) RANLIB="$($(package)_ranlib)" CC="$($(package)_cc)" @@ -48,6 +49,10 @@ $(package)_config_opts_x86_64_freebsd=BSD-x86_64 endef define $(package)_preprocess_cmds + patch -p1 -i $($(package)_patch_dir)/CVE-2023-0464.patch && \ + patch -p1 -i $($(package)_patch_dir)/CVE-2023-0465.patch && \ + patch -p1 -i $($(package)_patch_dir)/CVE-2023-0466.patch && \ + patch -p1 -i $($(package)_patch_dir)/CVE-2023-1255.patch && \ sed -i.old 's|crypto ssl apps util tools fuzz providers doc|crypto ssl util tools providers|' build.info endef diff --git a/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2b2105b --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ +From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Pauli +Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 +Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints + +A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions +of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains +that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this +vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers +exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service +(DoS) attack on affected systems. + +Fixes CVE-2023-0464 + +Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz +Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568) +--- + crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- + crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- + crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- + 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h +index 18b53cc09e..cba107ca03 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h +@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { + }; + + struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { ++ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ ++ size_t node_count; ++ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ ++ size_t node_maximum; ++ + /* This is the tree 'level' data */ + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; + int nlevel; +@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, + X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, ++ int extra_data); + void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); + int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, + const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c +index 9d9a7ea179..450f95a655 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c +@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, ++ int extra_data) + { + X509_POLICY_NODE *node; + ++ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ ++ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) ++ return NULL; ++ + node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); + if (node == NULL) { + ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); +@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + node->data = data; + node->parent = parent; +- if (level) { ++ if (level != NULL) { + if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { + if (level->anyPolicy) + goto node_error; +@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + } + +- if (tree) { ++ if (extra_data) { + if (tree->extra_data == NULL) + tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); + if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ +@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + } + ++ tree->node_count++; + if (parent) + parent->nchild++; + +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c +index fa45da5117..f953a05a41 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c +@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ + + #include "pcy_local.h" + ++/* ++ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to ++ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. ++ * ++ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the ++ * door on CVE-2023-0464. ++ */ ++#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX ++# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 ++#endif ++ + static void expected_print(BIO *channel, + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node, + int indent) +@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; + } + ++ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ ++ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; ++ + /* + * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. + * +@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL, + OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) + goto bad_tree; +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { + ossl_policy_data_free(data); + goto bad_tree; + } +@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise + */ + static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, +- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) ++ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + { + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; + int i, matched = 0; +@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); + + if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + matched = 1; + } + } + if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + } + return 1; +@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. + */ + static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, +- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) ++ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + { + int i; + +@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); + + /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ +- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) ++ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) + return 0; + } + return 1; +@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ + data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; + data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { + ossl_policy_data_free(data); + return 0; + } +@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ + if (last->anyPolicy && + ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, +- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) ++ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + return 1; + } +@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, + extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS + | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; + node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, +- tree); ++ tree, 1); + } + if (!tree->user_policies) { + tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); +@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + + for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { + cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert); +- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) ++ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; + + if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) +-- +2.40.1 diff --git a/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8db227f --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Matt Caswell +Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf + certs + +Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we +later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf +cert was bad. + +Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 + +Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau +Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587) +--- + crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++-- + 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c +index 9384f1da9b..a0282c3ef1 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c ++++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c +@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) + goto memerr; + /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ + if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { +- int i; ++ int i, cbcalled = 0; + + /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ +- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { ++ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { + X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); + ++ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0) ++ cbcalled = 1; + CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0, + ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); + } ++ if (!cbcalled) { ++ /* Should not be able to get here */ ++ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); ++ return 0; ++ } ++ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ + return 1; + } + if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { +-- +2.40.1 diff --git a/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2bfd741 --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +From 51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Tomas Mraz +Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() + +The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking. + +Fixes: CVE-2023-0466 + +Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell +Reviewed-by: Paul Dale +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20563) +--- + doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++-- + 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod +index 75a1677022..43c1900bca 100644 +--- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod ++++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod +@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B. + X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B to + B. Normally the current time is used. + +-X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled +-by default) and adds B to the acceptable policy set. ++X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B to the acceptable policy set. ++Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable ++policy checking. + + X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled + by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B. Any existing +@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i. + The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(), + and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0. + ++The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as ++enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this. ++The documentation was changed to align with the implementation. ++ + =head1 COPYRIGHT + + Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved. +-- +2.40.1 diff --git a/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-1255.patch b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-1255.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d4685ba --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/CVE-2023-1255.patch @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +From 02ac9c9420275868472f33b01def01218742b8bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Tomas Mraz +Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:51:20 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] aesv8-armx.pl: Avoid buffer overrread in AES-XTS decryption + +Original author: Nevine Ebeid (Amazon) +Fixes: CVE-2023-1255 + +The buffer overread happens on decrypts of 4 mod 5 sizes. +Unless the memory just after the buffer is unmapped this is harmless. + +Reviewed-by: Paul Dale +Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20759) + +(cherry picked from commit 72dfe46550ee1f1bbfacd49f071419365bc23304) +--- + crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl | 4 +++- + 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl +index 6a7bf05d1b..bd583e2c89 100755 +--- a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl ++++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl +@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/); + .align 4 + .Lxts_dec_tail4x: + add $inp,$inp,#16 +- vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16 ++ tst $tailcnt,#0xf + veor $tmp1,$dat1,$tmp0 + vst1.8 {$tmp1},[$out],#16 + veor $tmp2,$dat2,$tmp2 +@@ -3362,6 +3362,8 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/); + veor $tmp4,$dat4,$tmp4 + vst1.8 {$tmp3-$tmp4},[$out],#32 + ++ b.eq .Lxts_dec_abort ++ vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16 + b .Lxts_done + .align 4 + .Lxts_outer_dec_tail: +-- +2.40.1 diff --git a/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/fix_darwin.patch b/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/fix_darwin.patch deleted file mode 100644 index a917daa..0000000 --- a/contrib/depends/patches/openssl/fix_darwin.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,60 +0,0 @@ -From 96ac8f13f4d0ee96baf5724d9f96c44c34b8606c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: David Carlier -Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:40:14 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Darwin platform allows to build on releases before - Yosemite/ios 8. - -issue #16407 #16408 - -Reviewed-by: Paul Dale -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16409) ---- - crypto/rand/rand_unix.c | 5 +---- - include/crypto/rand.h | 10 ++++++++++ - 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/rand/rand_unix.c b/crypto/rand/rand_unix.c -index 43f1069d151d..0f4525106af7 100644 ---- a/crypto/rand/rand_unix.c -+++ b/crypto/rand/rand_unix.c -@@ -34,9 +34,6 @@ - #if defined(__OpenBSD__) - # include - #endif --#if defined(__APPLE__) --# include --#endif - - #if defined(OPENSSL_SYS_UNIX) || defined(__DJGPP__) - # include -@@ -381,7 +378,7 @@ static ssize_t syscall_random(void *buf, size_t buflen) - if (errno != ENOSYS) - return -1; - } --# elif defined(__APPLE__) -+# elif defined(OPENSSL_APPLE_CRYPTO_RANDOM) - if (CCRandomGenerateBytes(buf, buflen) == kCCSuccess) - return (ssize_t)buflen; - -diff --git a/include/crypto/rand.h b/include/crypto/rand.h -index 5350d3a93119..674f840fd13c 100644 ---- a/include/crypto/rand.h -+++ b/include/crypto/rand.h -@@ -20,6 +20,16 @@ - - # include - -+# if defined(__APPLE__) && !defined(OPENSSL_NO_APPLE_CRYPTO_RANDOM) -+# include -+# if (defined(__MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED) && __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= 101000) || \ -+ (defined(__IPHONE_OS_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED) && __IPHONE_OS_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= 80000) -+# define OPENSSL_APPLE_CRYPTO_RANDOM 1 -+# include -+# include -+# endif -+# endif -+ - /* forward declaration */ - typedef struct rand_pool_st RAND_POOL; -